Sunday, February 4, 2007

JIHAD

“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” George Santayana

If there is not a determined, deliberate plan to destroy this country, it is apparently unneeded, because the way it is happening could not be improved upon. Simply take a healthy, robust nation and begin injecting the poison of multiculturalism. Similar to the process of execution by lethal injection in the US, where sodium pentothal and pavulon are first injected to cause a stupefying, paralyzing effect, once multiculturalism and its foundation of mass immigration have brought about a similar result, the coup de grace is released into the bloodstream. In the US death chamber, it is potassium chloride; in the once strong but now stricken Australian body politic it takes the form of Islam – the avowed nemesis and destroyer of all who would have the temerity to not submit to the will of Allah.

Islam is like no other religion. There may have been some similarities between Islam and Christianity – but that was 500 years ago. Christianity progressed; Islam is still medieval. Christianity still goes to some lengths to win converts, but has never thought in terms of conversion or death: a hallmark of Islam which since its inception has been spread by the sword. In juxtaposition, Judaism has never gone out of its way to win converts and views those who do convert with a certain degree of suspicion. Buddhism gently woos, and Hinduism … well one is pretty much reincarnated in amongst this pantheon of gods.

What most non-Muslims apparently fail to appreciate is that Islam is not simply a religion. Rather, it is an entire package-plan for living – a seamless, socio-political religious system lacking even the conception of a separation between church and state. Born in blood and strife and sweeping across an unforgiving desert-world, it was a force uniquely capable of uniting primitive tribes entrenched since time immemorial in a war of all against all.

Also apparently missed by worshippers of more gentle gods, as well as those who worship no gods at all, is that Allah is a fearful god of great ambition inspiring expansionist-militaristic regimes. So it has been; so it always will be. However, in outright, frontal-attacking war, Islam has sustained too many defeats to not revise its strategy. Although fought to an exhausted stand-still, the Crusades no doubt greatly impressed Muslim warriors with the ferocity and tenacity of their counterparts. Notwithstanding that history re-writers are now painting the Crusaders as the initial aggressors, any historian worth his salt knows the truth: the Christians were motivated solely by the sacred purpose of winning back the holy lands from the Muslim invaders and plunderers.

In 732 AD there was absolutely no doubt about who the aggressors were. This is when Charles Martel (the Hammer) defeated Muslim forces at the battle of Tours and was credited with saving Western Europe from the Moorish Umayyad expansionism that had oppressed the Iberian Peninsula from 711 and which wasn’t to be finally taken back (Reconquistada) by Spanish Catholic forces in 1492.

The year 1529 was the year credited with being when the argument over who would rule Europe was finally settled (until the 21st century). This was when the forces of Sultan Suleiman 1 were stopped and turned back at the gates of Vienna.

As science and technology and exploration drove the West in great, unprecedented surges while Muslim lands stagnated as though anchored in time, the balance of power had shifted so decisively that it was obvious that the West could never again be challenged by Islam in conventional, military terms.

Instead, it smouldered with resentment for the centuries of being left floating in the wake of Western progress, with the ultimate humiliation eventually being suffered under the yoke of European colonization and the ensuing plundering of treasure (oil). Had the proud and fiery god failed? A Muslim could only harbour such thoughts at the risk of terrible retribution. At last, it appeared that Allah in fact was a patient and cunning god. The main chance came with the toxins that began to leach through the West in the form of liberalism, described by James Burnham as ‘the ideology Western suicide’ (1).

With this liberalism which had been perverted beyond recognition from its original doctrine of freedom of the individual to almost its exact opposite: political correctness, came the atoning waves of immigration from the third world, a belief, or rather the suspension of disbelief, in human equality held to with a fanaticism rivaling that of the most dedicated Communist and, of course, multiculturalism. Along with all the animals now being equal, all cultures, all beliefs, every bizarre practice and sexual perversion, and all religions were also equal. Hail postmodernism!

Accordingly, Islam, the former deadly enemy of the West (Western Christendom) was welcomed as warmly as a long lost relative. The strange incongruity of mosques sprouted like mushrooms. When the natives complained about their former peace and quiet being shattered by the unfamiliar noises issuing from these new establishments, they were treated with looks that were usually reserved for scab-encrusted drug-addicts and were remonstrated with for being ‘racist’. In the light of this response, a new reverence was learnt and, disarmed by ignorance, the natives, if they remembered anything at all of history, were told that everything had now changed and that Islam after all was simply another religion and as such deserving of tolerance.

The Muslims now ensconced in the camps of their enemies however knew better. They knew that nothing in fact had changed and that Islam was anything but just another religion. Any difficulties, any lingering antipathy was usually smoothly dealt with by a variation on the good-cop/bad-cop routine. How this works is that, given that ostensibly Islam comes in two speeds: fundamentalist and moderate, when a member of the former utters something shocking to ears of the kaffir (non-Muslim, thereby corrupt and rotten), a representative of the latter immediately sooths hurt feelings with claims that the former has been misinterpreted/comment taken out of context, and anyway does not represent true Islam. So when, for example, a Muslim leader claims Australian rape victims brought it upon themselves by dressing as Western women do, that is, as meat laid out for Muslim cats, a chorus is heard from the moderates (not immediately but eventually and with prompting) that this isn’t the teaching of true Islam.

The problem with this particular shell-game is that the true nature of Islam remains forever hidden, at least to the infidel. However, bearing in mind that just like Islam is like no other religion, the Koran is like no other holy book in that it is held to contain the voice of God itself, a reading of it should, it seems logical, reveal the true nature of Islam. Interestingly, the moderates don’t get much of a look-in; this is a book dripping in blood and giving unequivocal advice about dealing with non-believers.

As if no further proof that multiculturalism bears within itself the seeds of its own destruction, now that the barbarians are inside the gates they are decidedly not tolerant of ‘tolerance’ and have vowed to bend the host society into an image of themselves. Once this is accomplished (scoff as some may, in France, where breeding is proving to be the ultimate weapon now that the scimitar is no longer needed, one in three babies being born is a Muslim) it is difficult to see how the joys of diversity can continue to be celebrated.

If it wasn’t so fatally tragic, it would be laughable. Even as master politician, John Howard appears to be retreating from multiculturalism - because even he can smell the stench - to integrationism, which was the intermediate step after the immensely sensible immigrant settlement policy of assimilationism, Muslims not only contemptuously defy integration but are avowed to bending us to their will.

In the midst of our greatest city, an international caliphate was recently declared by a member of a terrorist organization barred in most other Western countries. This was nothing less than a call for the Islamic destiny as foretold in the Koran, but held up by historical events.

Elsewhere, a home grown Muslim now resident in London because of ‘Australian racism’ extolled the virtues of instilling into children the readiness to die for Allah in jihad against the forces of Satan – children raised for suicide! It doesn’t rate as suicide though because dying in the cause of an expansionist Islam is a glorious death, the reward to male martyrs being, amongst other things, seventy one virgins in an eternal paradise. As Muslims apparently unquestioningly believe such things, this would make for an easy death. One wonders though about the reward for female recruits.

There are of course laws, such as the one pertaining to incitement to racial hatred, in place with which to punish such behaviour, but given they are not used to curb it, it is glaringly obvious just who these laws were designed to be aimed at. It is also a graphic illustration of the cowardice of Western governments frozen like the mouse before the stare of the snake.

Australians have every right to fear the so called clash of civilizations coming to bus, train or market place near them. It is not a matter of if but when. This isn’t rocket science or star-gazing. Just do a quick reality check. Consider for a moment that, where other nations may be just a little circumspect, Australia is best mates with a superpower - itself a satellite of Israel -that has lost its mind and enjoys nothing better than belting the Muslim hornets' nest with a stick.

Given this extreme danger, it might appear advisable to re-evaluate the wisdom of bringing yet more Muslims into our country. But no. Even if this occurred to our illustrious leaders, they would be prevented from doing so by their shared, iron-clad globalist doctrine and by the fact that it would be damning heresy in the religion of multiculturalism. As they say in America, ‘go figure’.

(1) SUICIDE OF THE WEST: The definitive analysis of the pathology of liberalism
James Burnham

No comments: